+208.1%
LRCX vs LNT
+8.1%
+200.0%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | 0.0% | +5.2% | +5.1% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -0.1% | +2.0% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -3.2% | +3.3% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -4.1% | -4.4% | -10.9% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -4.6% | +42.6% | +34.5% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +7.0% | +73.1% | +83.1% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +8.3% | +199.8% | +223.8% |
| All | +208.1% | +8.1% | +200.0% | +223.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling