+42.8%
LRCX vs LNT
+13.9%
+28.9%
-48.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.0% | +2.3% | -6.3% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -12.8% | +7.2% | -19.9% | -7.9% |
| 30D | -36.0% | +15.6% | -51.6% | -29.0% |
| 3M | -30.2% | +5.2% | -35.4% | -26.9% |
| 6M | -14.2% | +1.7% | -15.9% | -11.4% |
| YTD | +29.7% | +17.0% | +12.7% | +44.8% |
| 1Y | +42.8% | +14.2% | +28.6% | +58.4% |
| All | +42.8% | +13.9% | +28.9% | +58.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling