+388.9%
LRCX vs LCID
-92.8%
+481.7%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -7.8% | +6.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -9.3% | +18.9% | +11.0% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -35.4% | +38.5% | +9.4% |
| 3M | -3.4% | -17.1% | +13.7% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +49.7% | -58.9% | +108.6% | +66.3% |
| YTD | +84.9% | -59.6% | +144.5% | +104.7% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | -78.0% | +278.8% | +261.7% |
| All | +388.9% | -92.8% | +481.7% | +543.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling