+261.7%
LRCX vs KRMN
+14.6%
+247.1%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | -2.4% | -3.3% | -5.0% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -15.1% | +17.0% | +6.4% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -44.5% | +40.2% | +12.4% |
| 3M | -7.3% | -25.0% | +17.7% | -1.2% |
| 6M | +38.6% | -66.5% | +105.1% | +84.0% |
| YTD | +74.4% | -53.0% | +127.4% | +104.5% |
| 1Y | +179.1% | -44.7% | +223.8% | +209.1% |
| All | +261.7% | +14.6% | +247.1% | +202.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling