+388.9%
LRCX vs IRM
+102.2%
+286.6%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IRM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.7% | -0.7% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +9.5% | +3.0% | +6.5% | +7.6% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -5.2% | +8.3% | +6.8% |
| 3M | -3.4% | -8.0% | +4.6% | +2.0% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +9.2% | +40.5% | +44.3% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +41.0% | +43.9% | +55.2% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +23.3% | +177.6% | +169.9% |
| All | +388.9% | +102.2% | +286.6% | +206.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IRM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IRM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IRM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IRM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling