+361.6%
LRCX vs HUBB
+46.2%
+315.4%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +1.8% | -1.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -0.1% | -3.0% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -10.0% | +1.4% | +0.9% |
| 3M | -17.7% | -1.6% | -16.1% | -15.2% |
| 6M | +36.4% | -3.1% | +39.4% | +41.7% |
| YTD | +74.5% | +4.6% | +70.0% | +71.3% |
| 1Y | +159.4% | +3.3% | +156.1% | +157.2% |
| 3Y | +361.6% | +46.6% | +315.0% | +242.1% |
| All | +361.6% | +46.2% | +315.4% | +242.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling