+361.3%
LRCX vs GRMN
+179.1%
+182.2%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | 0.0% | -5.7% | -5.6% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -1.8% | +3.6% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -12.1% | +7.8% | +0.3% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +18.0% | -25.3% | -14.2% |
| 6M | +38.6% | +13.7% | +24.8% | +30.8% |
| YTD | +74.4% | +35.3% | +39.1% | +53.5% |
| 1Y | +179.1% | +17.2% | +161.9% | +158.6% |
| All | +361.3% | +179.1% | +182.2% | +230.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling