+282.6%
LRCX vs GLXY
+15.1%
+267.5%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +2.7% | +1.4% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +10.4% | +15.5% | -5.0% | +5.4% |
| 30D | +2.9% | +34.1% | -31.2% | -6.7% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -11.3% | +10.2% | +0.1% |
| 6M | +60.9% | +31.6% | +29.3% | +46.4% |
| YTD | +87.5% | +21.0% | +66.6% | +71.1% |
| 1Y | +206.6% | +11.7% | +195.0% | +191.6% |
| All | +282.6% | +15.1% | +267.5% | +261.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling