-32.4%
LRCX vs GLDM
-13.2%
-19.2%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.2% | -0.8% | +9.0% | +8.8% |
| 7D | -16.2% | +4.7% | -20.8% | -19.6% |
| 30D | -39.2% | -0.9% | -38.3% | -38.5% |
| 3M | -34.4% | -4.3% | -30.1% | -32.3% |
| 6M | -32.4% | -13.4% | -19.0% | -17.4% |
| All | -32.4% | -13.2% | -19.2% | -17.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling