+361.3%
LRCX vs GH
+367.9%
-6.6%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | -2.3% | -3.3% | -5.2% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -1.2% | +3.1% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -3.7% | -0.6% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +21.7% | -29.0% | -10.9% |
| 6M | +38.6% | +75.7% | -37.2% | +24.2% |
| YTD | +74.4% | +55.7% | +18.7% | +59.4% |
| 1Y | +179.1% | +181.1% | -2.0% | +129.7% |
| All | +361.3% | +367.9% | -6.6% | +260.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling