+453.7%
LRCX vs FLNC
-70.4%
+524.1%
-56.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +2.5% | -2.4% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -4.1% | +1.0% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -24.8% | +16.2% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -17.7% | -59.1% | +41.4% | -1.9% |
| 6M | +36.4% | -42.0% | +78.3% | +44.9% |
| YTD | +74.5% | -49.8% | +124.3% | +86.1% |
| 1Y | +159.4% | +43.1% | +116.4% | +115.6% |
| 3Y | +361.6% | -61.0% | +422.5% | +328.4% |
| All | +453.7% | -70.4% | +524.1% | +348.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling