-32.4%
LRCX vs FAST
+19.5%
-52.0%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FAST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.2% | +0.2% | +8.1% | +8.2% |
| 7D | -16.2% | +2.1% | -18.3% | -16.3% |
| 30D | -39.2% | +6.9% | -46.1% | -39.6% |
| 3M | -34.4% | +4.8% | -39.2% | -34.9% |
| 6M | -32.4% | +19.8% | -52.2% | -36.1% |
| All | -32.4% | +19.5% | -52.0% | -36.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FAST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FAST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FAST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FAST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling