+206.6%
LRCX vs EPAM
-32.1%
+238.8%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -1.5% | +5.6% | +3.9% |
| 7D | +10.4% | -0.9% | +11.3% | +10.3% |
| 30D | +2.9% | +18.4% | -15.4% | +6.3% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +19.2% | -20.4% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +60.9% | -21.0% | +81.8% | +79.2% |
| YTD | +87.5% | -43.7% | +131.3% | +118.4% |
| 1Y | +206.6% | -29.9% | +236.5% | +232.8% |
| All | +206.6% | -32.1% | +238.8% | +232.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling