+388.9%
LRCX vs ENB
+76.5%
+312.4%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.7% | -0.8% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -0.3% | +9.9% | +9.5% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -1.1% | +4.2% | +3.1% |
| 3M | -3.4% | -8.5% | +5.1% | -3.1% |
| 6M | +49.7% | -4.5% | +54.2% | +49.5% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +9.1% | +75.8% | +82.8% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +8.0% | +192.9% | +197.7% |
| All | +388.9% | +76.5% | +312.4% | +346.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling