+361.3%
LRCX vs EEM
+83.8%
+277.4%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EEM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | -2.2% | -3.5% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -0.7% | +2.5% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -4.3% | +2.4% | -6.7% | -8.0% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +4.2% | -11.5% | -10.7% |
| 6M | +38.6% | +14.8% | +23.8% | +14.8% |
| YTD | +74.4% | +23.1% | +51.3% | +30.1% |
| 1Y | +179.1% | +32.5% | +146.6% | +87.8% |
| All | +361.3% | +83.8% | +277.4% | +98.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EEM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EEM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EEM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EEM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling