+243.9%
LRCX vs EAT
+476.7%
-232.8%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | +0.4% | -3.7% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +12.7% | -4.0% | +16.7% | +13.8% |
| 30D | -21.3% | -2.9% | -18.4% | -20.8% |
| 3M | -32.9% | -16.9% | -16.0% | -30.2% |
| 6M | -23.4% | +57.0% | -80.4% | -33.2% |
| YTD | +32.4% | +38.2% | -5.8% | +18.8% |
| 1Y | +48.0% | +69.3% | -21.2% | +26.5% |
| 3Y | +243.9% | +483.0% | -239.0% | +114.0% |
| All | +243.9% | +476.7% | -232.8% | +114.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling