+388.9%
LRCX vs EAT
+587.9%
-199.0%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -3.2% | +1.8% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -6.8% | +16.3% | +11.4% |
| 30D | +3.1% | -5.4% | +8.5% | +4.2% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +42.8% | -46.1% | -12.9% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +56.5% | -6.8% | +31.3% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +50.0% | +34.8% | +63.7% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +38.3% | +162.6% | +170.5% |
| All | +388.9% | +587.9% | -199.0% | +204.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling