+361.3%
LRCX vs DUOL
-8.7%
+370.0%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DUOL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | +4.3% | -9.9% | -6.1% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -8.6% | +10.4% | +2.8% |
| 30D | -4.3% | +7.2% | -11.5% | -5.5% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +19.1% | -26.4% | -11.2% |
| 6M | +38.6% | +52.5% | -14.0% | +25.0% |
| YTD | +74.4% | -17.3% | +91.7% | +78.4% |
| 1Y | +179.1% | -49.2% | +228.3% | +214.3% |
| All | +361.3% | -8.7% | +370.0% | +318.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DUOL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DUOL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DUOL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DUOL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling