+388.9%
LRCX vs DAR
+9.6%
+379.3%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.6% | -2.0% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -0.2% | +9.7% | +9.6% |
| 30D | +3.1% | +7.4% | -4.4% | +1.1% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +15.7% | -19.1% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +30.0% | +19.7% | +38.6% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +87.5% | -2.7% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +113.4% | +87.5% | +143.6% |
| All | +388.9% | +9.6% | +379.3% | +399.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling