+38.6%
LRCX vs CHTR
-36.8%
+75.3%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CHTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.6% | +5.0% | -10.6% | -4.7% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -7.1% | +9.0% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -10.9% | +6.6% | -5.6% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +2.0% | -9.3% | -5.5% |
| 6M | +38.6% | -35.9% | +74.5% | +35.9% |
| All | +38.6% | -36.8% | +75.3% | +35.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CHTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CHTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CHTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CHTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling