+38.1%
LRCX vs APH
-37.2%
+75.3%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | APH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -47.8% | +49.8% | +14.9% |
| 7D | -3.4% | -48.7% | +45.3% | +10.7% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -51.9% | +52.0% | +21.8% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -43.6% | +35.1% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +38.1% | -37.5% | +75.6% | +37.2% |
| All | +38.1% | -37.2% | +75.3% | +37.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling