+367.0%
LRCX vs AMC
-67.9%
+434.9%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +4.3% | +0.8% | +4.9% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +2.3% | -0.4% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -0.7% | +0.8% | +0.1% |
| 3M | -8.5% | +35.2% | -43.7% | -11.0% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +124.6% | -86.5% | +29.1% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +69.9% | +10.2% | +70.8% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -2.6% | +210.6% | +200.2% |
| All | +367.0% | -67.9% | +434.9% | +367.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling