+351.0%
LRCX vs AMBA
-1.0%
+351.9%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMBA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | -0.8% | +5.9% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -11.0% | +12.9% | +7.2% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -23.2% | +23.2% | +12.1% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -12.7% | +4.2% | -5.2% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +11.2% | +26.9% | +25.0% |
| YTD | +80.1% | -11.2% | +91.3% | +77.7% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | -22.5% | +230.6% | +216.8% |
| All | +351.0% | -1.0% | +351.9% | +301.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMBA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMBA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMBA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMBA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling