+230.4%
LRCX vs ALAB
+490.6%
-260.2%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ALAB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.1% | +9.8% | -4.6% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +1.9% | +7.2% | -5.3% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -2.5% | +2.6% | +0.8% |
| 3M | -8.5% | -13.3% | +4.8% | -4.4% |
| 6M | +38.1% | +172.8% | -134.8% | +7.3% |
| YTD | +80.1% | +86.6% | -6.5% | +49.8% |
| 1Y | +208.1% | +65.2% | +142.9% | +157.1% |
| All | +230.4% | +490.6% | -260.2% | +84.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALAB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALAB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALAB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALAB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling