+388.9%
LRCX vs ABBV
+87.0%
+301.9%
-47.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABBV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.9% | -2.3% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +9.5% | -4.1% | +13.7% | +9.8% |
| 30D | +3.1% | +1.2% | +1.9% | +2.8% |
| 3M | -3.4% | +12.1% | -15.5% | -5.9% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +12.0% | +37.7% | +45.6% |
| YTD | +84.9% | +12.4% | +72.5% | +79.5% |
| 1Y | +200.8% | +22.9% | +177.9% | +184.8% |
| All | +388.9% | +87.0% | +301.9% | +334.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABBV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABBV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABBV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABBV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling