+243.9%
LRCX vs AA
+67.6%
+176.4%
-57.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -1.8% | -1.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | +12.7% | +0.5% | +12.2% | +12.6% |
| 30D | -21.3% | -0.6% | -20.7% | -20.6% |
| 3M | -32.9% | -19.7% | -13.2% | -26.7% |
| 6M | -23.4% | -41.6% | +18.2% | -6.2% |
| YTD | +32.4% | -24.6% | +57.0% | +44.8% |
| 1Y | +48.0% | +4.9% | +43.2% | +42.5% |
| 3Y | +243.9% | +66.8% | +177.1% | +175.0% |
| All | +243.9% | +67.6% | +176.4% | +175.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling