-6.0%
LQD vs ZM
-68.2%
+62.1%
-25.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.1% | -0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -5.7% | +4.6% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -9.1% | +7.8% | -0.9% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +3.5% | -6.7% | -3.5% |
| 6M | -2.1% | +25.7% | -27.8% | -3.5% |
| YTD | -2.4% | +10.8% | -13.1% | -3.3% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | +12.8% | -15.4% | -3.7% |
| 3Y | +14.2% | +33.1% | -18.9% | +11.2% |
| All | -6.0% | -68.2% | +62.1% | -6.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling