+14.2%
LQD vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+114.2%
-6.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -7.1% | +7.0% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -5.4% | +4.3% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -24.8% | +23.5% | -1.3% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -62.8% | +59.6% | -3.1% |
| 6M | -2.1% | -99.5% | +97.4% | -2.4% |
| YTD | -2.4% | -99.8% | +97.4% | -2.7% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | -99.9% | +97.2% | -3.1% |
| 3Y | +14.2% | -100.0% | +114.2% | +11.9% |
| All | +14.2% | -100.0% | +114.2% | +11.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling