-2.7%
LQD vs UMC
+145.9%
-148.6%
-2.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +4.0% | -4.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +13.6% | -13.7% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -0.2% | +20.8% | -21.0% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -1.7% | +16.1% | -17.8% | -2.3% |
| 6M | -2.7% | +137.3% | -140.0% | -5.6% |
| All | -2.7% | +145.9% | -148.6% | -5.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling