+14.2%
LQD vs OKTA
+90.2%
-76.0%
-6.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | OKTA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -2.7% | +2.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -2.4% | +1.3% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +13.0% | -14.3% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +41.7% | -44.9% | -4.0% |
| 6M | -2.1% | +105.9% | -108.1% | -3.9% |
| YTD | -2.4% | +92.6% | -94.9% | -4.0% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | +81.1% | -83.7% | -4.2% |
| 3Y | +14.2% | +84.8% | -70.6% | +10.8% |
| All | +14.2% | +90.2% | -76.0% | +10.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside OKTA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus OKTA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × OKTA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded OKTA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling