+14.2%
LQD vs MTCH
-0.9%
+15.1%
-6.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTCH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.4% | -1.4% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +1.3% | -2.4% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +15.9% | -17.2% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +23.3% | -26.5% | -4.0% |
| 6M | -2.1% | +40.1% | -42.3% | -3.5% |
| YTD | -2.4% | +33.6% | -35.9% | -3.6% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | +14.1% | -16.7% | -3.3% |
| 3Y | +14.2% | +1.4% | +12.8% | +11.7% |
| All | +14.2% | -0.9% | +15.1% | +11.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTCH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTCH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTCH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTCH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling