+14.2%
LQD vs MCO
+42.6%
-28.4%
-6.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.6% | -1.7% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -3.8% | +2.7% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -0.4% | -0.9% | -1.3% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +7.7% | -10.9% | -4.0% |
| 6M | -2.1% | +7.0% | -9.1% | -3.0% |
| YTD | -2.4% | -6.4% | +4.1% | -1.8% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | -7.6% | +5.0% | -2.0% |
| 3Y | +14.2% | +43.2% | -29.0% | +5.4% |
| All | +14.2% | +42.6% | -28.4% | +5.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling