-1.2%
LQD vs GTLB
+51.8%
-53.0%
-2.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -5.4% | +5.4% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +4.6% | -4.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -0.6% | +21.0% | -21.6% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -1.2% | +51.7% | -52.9% | -2.1% |
| All | -1.2% | +51.8% | -53.0% | -2.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling