-6.0%
LQD vs FANG
+232.6%
-238.6%
-25.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | FANG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +2.9% | -4.0% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +2.6% | -3.9% | -1.3% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +7.6% | -10.8% | -3.2% |
| 6M | -2.1% | +17.3% | -19.4% | -2.2% |
| YTD | -2.4% | +38.7% | -41.0% | -2.5% |
| 1Y | -2.7% | +51.6% | -54.3% | -2.8% |
| 3Y | +14.2% | +50.0% | -35.8% | +13.6% |
| All | -6.0% | +232.6% | -238.6% | -6.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FANG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FANG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FANG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FANG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling