+40.3%
LPLA vs UMAC
+473.8%
-433.5%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -2.5% | +4.3% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -3.4% | +1.9% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -15.1% | +9.1% | -5.8% |
| 3M | +24.0% | -10.8% | +34.8% | +23.9% |
| 6M | +17.0% | +15.7% | +1.3% | +15.4% |
| YTD | -0.7% | +80.1% | -80.8% | -3.2% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | +116.7% | -114.6% | -1.1% |
| All | +40.3% | +473.8% | -433.5% | +37.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling