+2.1%
LPLA vs MTB
+24.6%
-22.5%
-32.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +0.3% | +1.5% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -1.5% | 0.0% | -1.5% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -4.8% | -1.2% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +24.0% | +6.0% | +18.1% | +19.4% |
| 6M | +17.0% | +19.6% | -2.6% | +3.7% |
| YTD | -0.7% | +21.5% | -22.1% | -11.2% |
| 1Y | +2.1% | +24.7% | -22.6% | -8.4% |
| All | +2.1% | +24.6% | -22.5% | -8.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling