+55.9%
LPLA vs ARMK
+114.7%
-58.8%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.9% | +0.6% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -2.4% | -0.7% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -0.1% | 0.0% | -0.1% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +23.2% | +6.7% | +16.6% | +20.6% |
| 6M | +15.5% | +38.8% | -23.3% | +4.0% |
| YTD | +0.9% | +55.2% | -54.3% | -12.7% |
| 1Y | +0.2% | +46.6% | -46.4% | -11.9% |
| All | +55.9% | +114.7% | -58.8% | +20.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling