+55.9%
LPLA vs ALHC
+136.3%
-80.4%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | 0.0% | -0.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -3.1% | -0.6% | -2.5% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -1.0% | +0.9% | -0.1% |
| 3M | +23.2% | -10.2% | +33.4% | +23.1% |
| 6M | +15.5% | -28.3% | +43.8% | +16.1% |
| YTD | +0.9% | -31.4% | +32.3% | +1.5% |
| 1Y | +0.2% | -16.9% | +17.1% | +0.5% |
| All | +55.9% | +136.3% | -80.4% | +60.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling