+35.5%
LONZ vs VT
+89.9%
-54.3%
-4.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +0.4% | -0.4% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +0.8% | +1.0% | -0.2% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +1.8% | +2.4% | -0.6% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +3.9% | +12.0% | -8.1% | +2.5% |
| YTD | +3.5% | +15.3% | -11.8% | +1.8% |
| 1Y | +5.0% | +22.6% | -17.6% | +2.5% |
| 3Y | +23.6% | +74.7% | -51.1% | +15.3% |
| All | +35.5% | +89.9% | -54.3% | +24.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling