+46.4%
LNT vs VIK
+236.8%
-190.4%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +2.6% | -1.7% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +1.0% | +3.6% | -2.6% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -16.7% | +15.6% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -3.6% | -1.1% | -2.5% | -3.6% |
| 6M | -2.7% | +27.8% | -30.5% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +8.0% | +23.3% | -15.3% | +6.5% |
| 1Y | +10.5% | +38.2% | -27.7% | +8.0% |
| All | +46.4% | +236.8% | -190.4% | +33.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling