+47.8%
LNT vs RPRX
+123.5%
-75.7%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RPRX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | 0.0% | -1.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -4.0% | +4.2% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +4.9% | -5.5% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -5.5% | +9.4% | -14.9% | -7.4% |
| 6M | -3.8% | +33.3% | -37.1% | -9.5% |
| YTD | +6.8% | +59.0% | -52.1% | -3.2% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | +69.2% | -59.9% | -2.5% |
| All | +47.8% | +123.5% | -75.7% | +21.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RPRX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RPRX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RPRX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RPRX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling