+47.8%
LNT vs PFG
+67.4%
-19.6%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.9% | -0.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +3.2% | -3.0% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +0.9% | -1.5% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -5.5% | +7.7% | -13.2% | -7.2% |
| 6M | -3.8% | +29.0% | -32.8% | -9.4% |
| YTD | +6.8% | +32.5% | -25.6% | -0.5% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | +47.3% | -38.0% | -1.3% |
| All | +47.8% | +67.4% | -19.6% | +24.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling