+9.3%
LNT vs NIO
-38.9%
+48.3%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -2.4% | +1.3% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -4.1% | +4.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -23.2% | +22.7% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -5.5% | -29.9% | +24.4% | -5.9% |
| 6M | -3.8% | -25.1% | +21.3% | -4.2% |
| YTD | +6.8% | -27.5% | +34.3% | +6.3% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | -41.1% | +50.4% | +8.9% |
| All | +9.3% | -38.9% | +48.3% | +8.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling