+70.7%
LNT vs LDOS
+33.8%
+36.9%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -2.4% | +3.0% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -1.3% | +1.1% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +11.6% | +10.1% | +1.5% | +10.8% |
| 3M | +8.2% | -4.7% | +12.8% | +8.5% |
| 6M | +3.1% | +5.6% | -2.4% | +2.4% |
| YTD | +16.8% | -25.1% | +41.9% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +11.6% | -31.7% | +43.3% | +14.6% |
| All | +70.7% | +33.8% | +36.9% | +47.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling