+16.4%
LNT vs KRMN
+17.4%
-1.0%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -11.3% | +10.2% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -12.9% | +13.0% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -43.3% | +42.8% | +0.9% |
| 3M | -5.5% | -27.2% | +21.7% | -4.9% |
| 6M | -3.8% | -66.8% | +63.0% | -0.6% |
| YTD | +6.8% | -51.9% | +58.7% | +7.6% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | -43.7% | +53.0% | +8.1% |
| All | +16.4% | +17.4% | -1.0% | +0.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling