+39.3%
LNT vs FLNC
-71.1%
+110.3%
-25.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -4.2% | +3.4% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -5.0% | +3.9% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -26.1% | +24.1% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -7.2% | -55.2% | +48.0% | -6.4% |
| 6M | -3.9% | -42.6% | +38.7% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +5.9% | -51.0% | +56.9% | +5.8% |
| 1Y | +8.4% | +43.3% | -35.0% | +4.7% |
| 3Y | +46.6% | -63.4% | +110.0% | +44.4% |
| All | +39.3% | -71.1% | +110.3% | +33.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling