+70.3%
LNT vs EPAM
-30.1%
+100.4%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.4% | +0.9% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +1.0% | +2.4% | -1.4% | +1.0% |
| 30D | +9.6% | +42.3% | -32.7% | +9.1% |
| 3M | +5.4% | +60.7% | -55.3% | +4.8% |
| 6M | +3.1% | +80.5% | -77.4% | +2.2% |
| YTD | +16.5% | -20.4% | +36.8% | +17.3% |
| 1Y | +12.3% | -9.6% | +21.9% | +12.4% |
| 3Y | +70.3% | -30.5% | +100.8% | +68.1% |
| All | +70.3% | -30.1% | +100.4% | +68.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling