+47.8%
LNT vs EAT
+587.9%
-540.1%
-12.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -3.2% | +2.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -6.8% | +7.0% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -5.4% | +4.9% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -5.5% | +42.8% | -48.3% | -7.1% |
| 6M | -3.8% | +56.5% | -60.3% | -6.0% |
| YTD | +6.8% | +50.0% | -43.2% | +4.4% |
| 1Y | +9.3% | +38.3% | -29.0% | +7.3% |
| All | +47.8% | +587.9% | -540.1% | +16.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling