+46.5%
LNT vs BBIO
+154.4%
-108.0%
-13.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.1% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -3.2% | +2.2% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -4.2% | -13.6% | +9.4% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -6.7% | +7.2% | -13.9% | -7.0% |
| 6M | -3.6% | +1.5% | -5.0% | -3.8% |
| YTD | +5.9% | -5.3% | +11.2% | +5.8% |
| 1Y | +7.3% | +37.7% | -30.5% | +5.1% |
| 3Y | +46.5% | +153.9% | -107.4% | +32.0% |
| All | +46.5% | +154.4% | -108.0% | +32.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling