+69.9%
LNT vs ARWR
+84.4%
-14.6%
-18.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.5% | +0.2% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -17.7% | +19.2% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +12.1% | -21.9% | +34.0% | +12.8% |
| 3M | +8.2% | -44.5% | +52.7% | +9.9% |
| 6M | +3.6% | -32.6% | +36.2% | +4.5% |
| YTD | +16.2% | -26.2% | +42.4% | +16.7% |
| 1Y | +12.8% | +23.0% | -10.2% | +11.0% |
| All | +69.9% | +84.4% | -14.6% | +62.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling