+75.9%
LNG vs SNAP
-44.0%
+119.9%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SNAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -2.2% | +2.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -6.7% | -5.0% | -1.7% | -6.6% |
| 30D | +3.9% | -0.7% | +4.6% | +3.8% |
| 3M | +15.5% | -5.0% | +20.5% | +15.6% |
| 6M | +10.5% | +3.5% | +7.0% | +10.4% |
| YTD | +43.0% | -34.2% | +77.2% | +45.7% |
| 1Y | +18.9% | -27.1% | +45.9% | +20.3% |
| All | +75.9% | -44.0% | +119.9% | +79.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SNAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SNAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SNAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SNAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling