+85.9%
LNG vs LDOS
+30.5%
+55.5%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.4% | +0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +11.3% | -1.6% | +13.0% | +11.5% |
| 30D | +10.6% | +8.2% | +2.4% | +9.5% |
| 3M | +16.1% | -8.2% | +24.3% | +17.1% |
| 6M | +29.6% | +5.8% | +23.7% | +28.4% |
| YTD | +60.3% | -27.0% | +87.3% | +65.9% |
| 1Y | +46.1% | -31.0% | +77.1% | +52.3% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | +29.3% | +56.7% | +93.8% |
| All | +85.9% | +30.5% | +55.5% | +93.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling